The accrual basis of accounting is the method under which revenues are recognized on the income statement when they are earned, and expenses are recognized when they are incurred, rather than when cash is actually received or paid. It is the method required under both US GAAP and IFRS for all but the smallest businesses, standing in direct contrast to the simpler cash basis of accounting.
How revenue and expenses are matched
Under accrual accounting, a sale on credit is recognized as revenue the moment goods are delivered or a service is performed, with the offsetting entry increasing accounts receivable rather than cash, even though payment may not arrive for weeks. Expenses follow the same logic in reverse: a cost is recognized in the period the related benefit is consumed or the obligation is incurred, not necessarily the period in which the cash is paid, which is the foundation of the matching principle that ties expenses to the revenue they helped generate.
The balance sheet side of accrual entries
Every accrual-based revenue or expense recognition has a corresponding effect on the balance sheet. Recognizing revenue before cash is received increases accounts receivable; recognizing revenue when cash was already collected in advance instead decreases a liability such as unearned revenue. Recognizing an expense before it is paid increases a liability such as accounts payable or accrued expenses payable; recognizing an expense that was already paid for in advance instead decreases an asset such as prepaid expenses. This is why adjusting entries are a routine part of closing the books each period, catching up revenues and expenses that straddle the cash-timing gap.
Why GAAP and IFRS require it
Accrual accounting exists because cash-basis results can be badly misleading about a company's actual performance in any given period — a business could look highly profitable in a month it happens to collect several old invoices, or unprofitable in a month it happens to pay several old bills, neither of which reflects genuine operating performance. By matching revenue to the period it was actually earned and expenses to the period they actually helped generate that revenue, accrual accounting gives a far more accurate picture of profitability over time, which is why regulators and standard-setters have made it mandatory for all but the smallest qualifying businesses.
The trade-off: profit versus cash
The cost of this more accurate profit picture is that accrual net income and actual cash flow can diverge meaningfully within any single period, which is exactly why the statement of cash flows exists as a required companion to the income statement — reconciling the two is considered essential reading for anyone trying to judge whether a company's reported profitability is actually backed by real cash generation rather than favorable timing choices or aggressive judgment calls in how revenue and expenses were recognized.
Accrual accounting and professional judgment
Because accrual accounting depends on recognizing economic events before cash confirms them, it inevitably requires estimates — how much of a receivable will actually be collected, how long an asset will remain useful, how much warranty cost a product will eventually generate — that cash accounting largely avoids. This is both accrual accounting's greatest strength, since it captures economic reality more faithfully, and its greatest vulnerability, since those same estimates create room for aggressive or even fraudulent manipulation of reported results, which is exactly why external audits exist to test whether a company's accrual judgments are reasonable rather than self-serving.